• Embalming Services Dubai

    9900k vs 3900x gaming reddit. Right now I have the R 9 3900x which has been good to me.

    9900k vs 3900x gaming reddit 0 for AMD) Posted by u/Oliveiraz33 - 1 vote and 13 comments Skip to main content. It all seems oriented around how the game's programing is optimized. I guess the 10700K will be better for gaming thanks to the frequency advantage (although it will need a hefty cooling solution I suppose, it's basically a tuned up 9900K) while the 3900X will be better for anything else. 4k 144hz is plenty. (Currently gaming at 1080p) -i may overclock sometime in the future For some games, there are a huge difference in deltas between the 3900x and 9900k. I heard a lot that when it comes to pure gaming the 9900k outperforms 3900x What are your thoughts Posted by u/alpha7781 - 2 votes and 8 comments The 9900K has better single core performance, so in gaming it would even outperform the 3900X. My friend's B350 motherboard is rocking a 5800x3d. Right now I have the R 9 3900x which has been good to me. So im actually more cpu limited than a lot setups. Skill 3600MhzCL16 kit for both CPUs. The 9900k gets a higher single core clock so in games that use a minimum number of cores expect it to win. I was wondering at the same price between 990K and 3900X which of the two was better performing for minecraft (therefore single core performance) and I think it is the 9900K. X570 motherboards are very spendy. Unless the 9900K is $200-$250 i wouldn't do it. Reply reply xnick2dmax Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. 3900x and 9900k get the same exact FPS in every 4k game, while the 3900x is better in every other aspect of using my PC Posted by u/MrBizzySSJ - 1 vote and 14 comments Posted by u/mendookusaii - 1 vote and 5 comments 9900k/3900x seems to accomplish the same for less money in gaming/light apps , and 10940x/10980xe offer similar speeds but with a whole lot more storage & expansion flexibility. 7Ghz. Moreover, they were 18% What is the difference between AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Intel Core i9-9900K? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. Heavy gaming focus on this machine, I've already got everything set except mobo and CPU. Dec 26, 2019 · In Cinebench R20's multi-core score the 3900X and 3700X provided roughly the same performance, making them around 14% faster than the 9900K when matched clock-for-clock. Is the 3700x/3900x the better option due to having more cores/ threads today? or is the 9900k still the way to go due to the raw gaming performance advantage at single core (even though the difference is not significant/ probably not even a factor at my resolution?) I just updated my 9900k 5ghz, aorus pro z390, gtx 1080ti rig to latest bios + win 10 1903. I cannot tell any difference at all in gaming. Otherwise, 9600K seems to be the deal for pure gaming. 264 on-timeline performance, the AMC 3900x or 3950x will supercede the i9-9900kf? Not sure about the 3900X, but the 3950X yes. This includes all the latest mitigations. I've seen some benchmarks and reviews for both the 3900x and 3950x and am wondering if the 3900x is enough for higher streaming presets, or if I'm going to wish I had more (3950x, *4900x*, etc. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit 【Benchmark】Ryzen 9 3900X/Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i9 9900K Looks like 3900x will beat 9900k 17 votes, 40 comments. Other than gamers comparing specs and synthetic benchmarks I don't see the use case for 3950x. ). I have 3 PCs, one with 3900x for gaming and is my main setup, one that has a 2400g that is for my Plex Server (let it be known that I never use the APU and will be swapping it out) and 1 Hackintosh setup with R 7 1700. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a… RYZEN 9 3900X: i9 9900K: Motherboard MSI X570 TOMHAWK MB: MSI z390 Gaming Edge AC MB. -possibly a hackintosh -run multiple monitors 2-3 -want to game at at least 1440p while getting 120 fps. It is slower. Usage is benching the first two weeks, and a little gaming. I really don't need to see a 1080p graph to tell me that 9900k is slower than 12900k. 9900K Data collected from We don't know the performance yet so there's little point in comparing the two other than the 8 cores vs 12 cores part. Money is not an… Posted by u/test123test123456 - 1 vote and 27 comments My then about 150$ X370 motherboard is still running like a champ, but now with a Ryzen 9 3900X, using my ryzen 7 in a server with a cheap B450 motherboard. Aug 30, 2019 · The ultimate CPU battle – the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs the Intel Core i9-9900K. 4M subscribers in the buildapc community. Some video applications can benefit from QuickSync or high single thread performance, and this allows Intel a few victories in some video editing scenarios, but the 3900X's raw core count usually wins the day See full list on tomshardware. If I feel like upgrading at some point I'll get a 5800x3d and put my 3900X in my server. The 3900x beat the shit out of the 9900k in everything until it got to gaming and then the 9900k pulled ahead. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home Open navigation Go to Reddit Home Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Most people who buy 4090 aren't buying it for 1080p. As the title says I'm looking to upgrade my cpu. For productivity, the 3900X. I think both are good options honestly I wouldn't swing you either way but wanted to mention the ~5% difference in gaming benchmarks is at the tippy top echelon with the absolute highest GPU money can buy. It's difficult to predict how long a part will last since we can't predict the performance gains each future generation will make. Moreover, they were 18% Mar 25, 2019 · To see easier numbers go to the site below, translate it, about overclocked RAM on a 9900K and a 3900X. All those processors are 8 core 16 thread, and should boast the best overclocking opportunities. Its the same as the multicore arguement for bulldozer back in the day. RAM ADATA XPG 16GB 32GB RAM 3000Mhz ADATA XPG 16GB 32GB RAM 3000Mhz GPU RTX2080Ti 11GB GPU RTX2080Ti 11GB GPU SMPS Corsair RM 750W 1000W 559K subscribers in the CitiesSkylines community. TechSpot 3900X vs 9900K. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen3, RDNA3, EPYC… 10 votes, 11 comments. Upgrade to a 5000x series Ryzen and you’ll outperform the 9900K. Also in most games the 3700x spanked the 9900k and the 3900x did too. At that resolution you'll be GPU limited anyways so the 3900X is more versatile. Its really all depends on what your doing. I only see about a 5fps increase on minimums, and possibly averages for the 9900k on future games. Without the iGPU the 9900K loses out on one of its biggest strengths which is h. It's also the better value with the stock cooler. The obvious difference between the two is the 3900X has two chiplets but might be less obvious is that each chiplet has two CCX. If you’re using the 3900x now and performance is fine, stick with it. Do all of this simultaneously. Intel Core i9 9900K Performance In 400+ Benchmarks Gaming: 9900K ahead by 2 So essentially, what you're saying is that outside of H. If zen 3 gets close to 5ghz, it’s probably going to bear intel. Terms & Policies . Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon… If you look at OP's link you can see the 3900X and 9900K edge it out by like 5% max in some games, for what double the price or more? The 3700X would again be max 5% better in the vast majority of current games and cost at least 50% more than the 3600. To get to 4133Mhz, the CPU had to be What is the difference between AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Intel Core i9-9900K? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. A few people pointed out in some videos and threads that a lot of the tests against the 9900K have it only using 2666mhz memory, and the results with 3200mhz and 4000mhz give very significant improvements when used. Does anyone have any personal experience upgrading while using those programs? Or found benchmarks showing such? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Anyway for comparison here is the 9900k vs the 10900k, not a huge difference so you can draw some The 9900k is competing with 3700x/3800x, the 3900x has 4 more cores. 4k maybe. 3. It is the best in gaming and single-core tasks, however, it is a dead-end platform with no future upgrade paths. And it's not to say the 9900K is a bad work chip it's really good, and the 3900X is also great for gaming. The 9900k is quite abit more expensive than the 3700x for very similar performance. If I had to choose between the two, I'd probably go for the 3900X, but honestly this strikes me as buying based on "more expensive = faster" mentality. Search up on youtube and see which fits you better. If you are really doing anything else that could use more threads or cores, eg streaming on the same machine, rendering, then i would go for the 3900X. The current $250 difference isn't an issue, and I can get a $30 bundle discount* on either from Micro Center (*$470 or $720). 0Ghz with 4533MhzCL17 RAM 36. I haven't seen too many results where the 3900x beats the 9900K in gaming. From what I researched so far, a 9900k in a fractal define r6 with a dark rock pro at stock speeds (4,7ghz all core) should be less than 65 degrees in gaming loads so that would be amazing. He says the 3900X is the better investment if you plan to do more than just gaming, or keep your CPU for 3+ years. The point of the comparison is to show how close the 3900x can get to the 9900K. If you were targeting 60 or 75 or 90 or 100hz, the difference would be non-existent and I'd actually recommend the 3700X, but you're aiming for 144, so the 9900K is the best choice, in terms of performance. . 9900K is a slightly better gaming chip but the 3900X is a better work chip (editing, rendering, etc. In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Computerbase and Techpowerup says that the 3900x is better than the 9900k by 2-3%. Now I'm not much of an expert on these things, but I mostly use my pc for gaming. However, my base use has shifted heavily. Agree with all your points though, only reason to go with a 9900K for gaming is if money is no object and you only game. However in specific use cases, gaming being the most obvious, the 9900k is superior. 16% increase in FPS when the CPU is not overclocked. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Some video applications can benefit from QuickSync or high single thread performance, and this allows Intel a few victories in some video editing scenarios, but the 3900X's raw core count usually wins the day Jul 12, 2019 · We’ll take a look at high-level features, available motherboards, overclocking, power consumption, gaming performance, productivity and value to determine which is the better CPU. 5M subscribers in the pcgaming community. Skip to main content. 0 (4. com Aug 30, 2019 · The ultimate CPU battle – the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs the Intel Core i9-9900K. Also the 3900x afaik is going to be pulling 9900k levels from the wall. 3700x seems to be the golden chip which is why it is just as out of stock as the 3900x have been. For a much, much lower price. Although the KF is sort of a bad idea, as you miss out on the iGPU. Edit: Some Average FPS Performance Summary: 1440p Ultra: 2080 Ti: 9900K - 144 3900X - 137 3600 - 134 2070 Super: 9900K - 120 3900X - 114 3600 - 113 1440p Medium (High for Rainbow Six): 2080 Ti: 9900K - 167 3900X - 157 3600 - 150 a direct comparison between 9900k and 3900x with the same ram would be nice example "normal" ram @3200MHz cl 14 and one at 3800MHz tight timings I think one russian site did that, gotta find it The gaming performance in 1440p is the same as it would be in 720p. It’s one of the fastest processors for gaming at the moment next to the binned ks and AMDs 3900x and 3950x I upgraded from a 3700x to a 5800x3d and the improvement was insane in all games 30-50fps increase in warzone and 50+ increase in tarkov at 1440p, not only were max frames higher but the 1% lows were significantly higher making everything a lot smoother. Reply reply selling him a 9900k + mobo for 400 isn't really that generous given the price of a 10700k. Other games it's the opposite. Crypto Posted by u/trancer43fggh - No votes and 4 comments The z370 Aorus Gaming 7 is basically the only z370 board worth dropping a 9900K in. I see no reason to play at 1080p 240hz even though I play FPS games semi-competitively. Also consider some statements that the 3900x had way better framerates with the 5700xt compared to an nvidia GPU. So if you are getting the GPU also for gaming, keep it, if you are getting the GPU for encoding, go for a lower end 1050TI card and pocket the savings or upgrade cpu. Versus 9900k @ 5. I think that perhaps in gaming it will come down to the R7 3700X and R7 3800X vs the i9 9900K. 3Ghz with 3800MhzCL14 RAM 63. Yes, I also do 3D rendering and video editing, but it's all… Advertisement 90 percent of reddit pc enthusiasts are using their pcs for games. If both are priced at MSRP, the 9900K is just too expensive for what it brings and AMD is often better value. 4GHz. The extra cores of a 3900X are not really used when "only" gaming and streaming, so it doesn't really make sense to go there. 264 hardware I have always been an AMD guy but have seen that the 9900k has better benchmarks and intend to use this pc solely for comp gaming in a CPU intensive… Advertisement Coins the GPU (3080 ti) will still be the bottleneck for 4k gaming, which is what I play. What I want to do: -gaming, video editing, multi-tasking. With the 3900X with PBO+AO and the 9900K at 5GHz, the 3900X is 5% slower in average. Some games the 9900k beats the 3900x by a little bit. 2ns latency (the best latency I've seen so far). In real world gaming, it's not significantly slower than the 3900X (and not at all in 2k or 4k gaming). Even if you "purely" game on your PC, the 3900X is still the better choice for the The 9900K has a bit more gaming performance now, and a bit better gaming headroom for better performance in the future. For these games, and the majority of future games, having more total processing power will naturally be better than having less total processing power. If you want smooth 60fps gaming I would suspect the 9700k will be perfectly fine for a long long time. Neither chip smashes the other out of the park in gaming performance. The 3900X and 3950X are both for professional work, for gaming you should either choose the 3700X or 3800X. If youre gaming, 9900k is undisputed top chip. With where the FPS's are though, and purely for gaming, unless you're buying a 2080 Ti, Steve recommends the 3600. Not a weird comparison at all, in most cases having SMT off or even HT off is beneficial for gaming. Imo if you want the best gaming CPU but that still high end get the 3700x the value is insane. If you are on the edge wait to see if Intel price drops and then if you are just gaming it might be a slightly better deal for the 9900k. Are you strictly gaming, if so then go for the i9. Depending on your workload, also take a good look at the Ryzen 3600. Business, Economics, and Finance. Test showed 3-10% better performance between 3700x and 3900x so 10% is not worth the couple hundred dollars more that I could throw at the gpu and help my gaming and streaming. At this point, we have no STRONG evidence to suggest that. Sep 17, 2019 · Render için bir sistem toplanıyorsa fazladan çekirdek yüzünden R9 3900X çok iyi bir işlemci. Disabling SMT is pretty hit and miss on the 3900x, and won't change the average gaming performance much if at all. All these cpu:s are so good for gaming you can't really go wrong with any, its just down to price/performance which AMD is the winner in. 32 votes, 39 comments. Bunun için o parayı vermek saçma geliyor. 3900x would not really help me in terms of productivity, also it runs too hot, it’d be overkill. 10900k for gaming easily. Intel i9-9900k vs Ryzen 9 3900x in gaming while The 9900k is rated for 95w but pulls way more than that, especially overclocked it can reach to 150w or more. I saw how much faster (a good 60-100%) the 3900X is at compiling, UE4 development and other multi-core tasks, while only being marginally slower at gaming (well, only as long as new games don't make proper use of multiple cores, the 12-core 3900X might even be better for gaming than the 5600X in the long run, who knows really) Even with a brand Oct 5, 2019 · So I have seen a lot of benchmarks where the Ryzen 3rd gen CPUs get really close to a 9900k in gaming, to the point where it would be more worth it to buy the Ryzen cpus instead, whether you Mar 13, 2017 · As an "overall" CPU, the 3900X is clearly superior. The only way a 3900X could beat a 10900K in gaming is if you run something in the background with very heavy CPU load while playing. For a workload mix, if you'll be using AE and/or PS I'd say the 9900K is better but for anything else, the 3900X. However look at the 3700x its meeting or beating both of those cpus in games. Hi PCMasterRace, I'm looking at upgrading my i5 7600k, quad core, 4 threads at 4. Both are the best offering from each side of the CPU war, but which one comes out on top? I will dive deep and find out which CPU is truly better. Many high end gamers are leaning toward Intel, but seeing SMT off makes it reasonable to switch to AMD for comparable single-threaded performance, while have enough For just gaming, the 9900K. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the… The 9900k usually retails for 480 and the 3700x for 327, are you sure you don't mean the 3900x? If the cpus you listed are the case, I would go with the 9900k all day Reply reply However, the 3900X is lagging behind the 9900K all the way down to RX 580 (230 vs 225; 210 vs 203, 164 vs 160) even though at these numbers there should not be a CPU bottleneck. I'm looking at getting either the 9900K or the 3900X, only… Cant go wrong with either of those beasts. The problem with judging the R9 3900X is we don't know enough about it right now, and probably won't till the independent reviews come out. Games that are optimized for 12threads will work perfectly on the 8 core 8 thread 9700k. Should I buy the Intel i9-9900k (delided) or Ryzen 9 3900x? My specs: -msi rtx 2080 ti gaming x trio (for both) -gigabyte aorus master z390/ x570 (x570 for AMD) -corsair h150i pro (for both) -be quiet pure base 600 (for both) -samsung 970 evo plus/ gigabyte nvme 4. A community-led subreddit for Cities: Skylines and Cities: Skylines II, the city-builder games from… Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Yes, the 3900X chip from AMD whoops the 9900K in blender and production stuff, and still does well in Posted by u/trancer43fggh - 1 vote and 6 comments Idea is to understand where 9900k ball park figures are or whether we have enough data to conclude that 9900k needs upgrade. These CPUs are basically identical in price. 3ns latency + uncore at 4. In the case of 3900x vs 9700k, the latter is going to pull 40watts~ less. Not anything else that requires CPU power really. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. In the case of the 3700X, it had 4 cores per CCX and 3900X has 3 cores per CCX. 4M subscribers in the nvidia community. 6M subscribers in the Amd community. For PC gaming news and discussion! True. Yes the 3900x wins everything else. 1. Also Check out this video talking about that with a gaming GPU, few faster cores can often beat out MANY more slower cores too (The $300 vs $4000 CPU challenge). Not wanting to close background applications like chrome etc. r/buildapc A chip A close button Edit: Wait a second, doesn't the i9 10900X have 10 Cores/20 Threads? Then again the R9 3900X has 12 Cores/24 Threads already and the i9 9900K only has 8 Cores/16 Threads (Though per core is a bit faster a few percent really) and if all of them are very comparable in single core performance the R9 3900X takes the cake. If you are only gaming why are you considering a 9900K and not the 9700K? They are the same in gaming performance but the 9700K is like $150 cheaper. 3900X, having 12 physical cores, which is 4 cores more than the 9900K, will definitely outperform the 9900K. 2-4. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Ryzen 5600g vs 3900x for gaming? Build Help Ryzen 3900X RAM scaling vs. However, the 3900x has 4c/8t more than the 9900k. I'd be surprised if you found a whole lot of reviews showing the 9900k performing better in gaming AND streaming at the same time than a 3900x, especially as time goes on. The 3900X/9900K in gaming will not be that much faster than the 3700X/9700K, which makes more sense as a purchase. There is another possibility which is the way the cores are laid out in the 3900X vs the 3700X. 3 is pretty impressive indeed for ryzen. With 9900k at 5ghz and being average of 5-6% faster at 1080p vs ryzen that is likely at 4. The 9900K is a bittersweet product. All of them will last you for years to come. If you're going to use NEVNC, then the 10900K will give you more FPS. 3900x for big workloads otherwise the R5 3600 for gaming, anything else in the middle I guess either the 3700x or 9900k, the 9900k at £405 is interesting although hate Intel for all the security issues, even though for my hardware it doesn't really matter. First off I wouldn't go far as saying amd' current single core performance is bad, but there's no denying that intel leads there. They used the same G. The 10900k with 10 cores and z490 releases in a month or so, maybe see how that does before you make a decision. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 9900k for gaming. If there were better gpus available (3080ti) then the difference would show at higher resolutions aswell, hence why it is said that an Intel cpu will be better for gaming in the future aswell. 3900x for gaming/productivity work. The 9900k is gonna be the least affected cpu since it has so much extra overhead. They tested 3900x @ 4. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Which is true in the case of 3900 vs 9900k. 6. This actually replicates itself across the games, CPUs, and GPUs. Given that rendering typically likes more cores, and this is true for solidworks and keyshot, you can assume it will spank the 9900k. I play at 1080p 240hz. If you're budget constrained, having that extra money go to better RAM and GPU will give you a better overall experience. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon… Differences between 9900K and 3900X. The shop I'm using has a 60 days return policy, so if I'm not happy with the 3700X, I can just return it for a full refund, and get the 3900X. 3900x if you prefer to save 100-200 bucks. I’m up in the air about this. Also the 3900X isn't a gaming chip whatever AMD says. PCWorld and Guru3D disagrees with a difference of 7% in favor of 9900k. If you do anything outside of those parameters, the 3900x is tied with the 9900k in gaming, and crushes it in multi-thread workloads. 3900x is close enough in gaming to 9900K and dominant enough in everything else to make it the better buy otherwise, IMHO. But afaik a 3800x and 9700k are comparable power consumption wise. Oct 5, 2019 · So I have seen a lot of benchmarks where the Ryzen 3rd gen CPUs get really close to a 9900k in gaming, to the point where it would be more worth it to buy the Ryzen cpus instead, whether you Mar 13, 2017 · As an "overall" CPU, the 3900X is clearly superior. I was able to get 2 9900K's for $500 so i went ahead and did it. İ9 9900K bence sadece 1080P oyunlarda biraz daha fazla FPS veriyor. Also super stoked for a 3900x. This also applies to 3900X vs 10700K, but with a lower threshold for the non-game CPU load. bpwv lgxwz sqpo hjenaa svxu jlmgr zujbkbz bbvm pedx ddiga iuvvjo qbrme zbn zht qtum